Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Xiyu Wang vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Xiyu Wang vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wang 3 - 0 Loeb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 44.98% of points on his second serve, while Loeb has won 48.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 56.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 53.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.99% and 39.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 59.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 56.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Loeb winning 48.21% (W/L 27/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 60/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 61.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 13), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Wang winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Wang winning 6 and Loeb winning 1. The last match between Wang and Loeb was at the Championnats Banque Nationale - Granby, 22-08-2022, First, Hard with Xiyu Wang getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Loeb have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wang winning 1 times and Loeb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 1, and Loeb 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.93 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 304.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 32% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 47.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 47.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 3 - 0 Loeb
53
Rank
49
High
23
Age
L
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
59% (199-141)
Career Total W/L
55% (295-245)
50% (13-13)
YTD W/L
56% (15-12)
$1,136,020
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 43 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 13 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:3 | 1:44:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (119/214) | 49% (112/230) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (87/119) | 64% (72/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (51/95) | 41% (48/118) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (14/27) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (110/230) | 36% (76/214) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Xiyu Wang
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
10
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Jamie Loeb
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Xiyu Wang | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (13/13) | 56% (15/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (32/29) | 56% (36/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (301/280) | 53% (313/273) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 96 | 79 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:13 | 1:45:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 146.38 | 302.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1186/1824) | 55% (1010/1841) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (788/1186) | 66% (667/1010) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (287/638) | 49% (406/830) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (85/180) | 46% (109/237) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (743/1763) | 45% (865/1913) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 56% (15/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (16/11) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 18% (11/2) |
Xiyu Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Xiyu Wang
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Xiyu Wang
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Xiyu Wang
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Ana Bogdan
75%
(
89 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
94 of
139)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
60 of
94)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
64 of
139)
135
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 4-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Xiyu Wang
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Xiyu Wang
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
118)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Xiyu Wang
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Xiyu Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
